Fellas, is it a crime to want to share something you enjoy? As long as you aren’t demonizing people who haven’t seen it, who cares?

Uh yeah but also I think I get a chance to get out and buy one yet or not to bad people I know you are going to be a little more than I do you know.

Not just the teeth but also the same thing as the other one that I have a dragon crossbow and blow pipe what is my next upgrade osrs I have to work on it.

I know and what is even more ridiculous than what I am doing now is to be honest with you and I will be there for you and I will be in your prayers.

As if changing your name would do anything lol

“actually my name is Beth now, I changed it”

“yeah whatever IKEA”

In my view, I don’t think it was aimed soIely at communism. Can’t speak for the intent of the poster unless they weigh in though. My view when saying they wanted to test something and then say several groups were horrible was to get a reaction from those that belong to said groups as a sort of half assed shotgun technique. I really didn’t expect it to get a rise out of anyone reasonable which is why I made my initial comment. All of those groups listed have various sized vocal subgroups that will aggressively defend their view points with a “them vs us” take.

That said the view points themselves are very different so that is where the equivalence stops.

You seem to know what you’re talking about, and not going to debate you on any of the points you just brought up. I certainly don’t disagree with anything you just said. I just still feel it’s a stretch to assume that comment is equating all of those things that were listed. That’s not what I took away from it at all, and still don’t.

Well that’s not very nice, calling people names.

1. Is wasn’t mine

2. You’re trying to hard to see what you want to see in order to sound morally superior for Internet high fives.

It is clearly a half assed joke saying that if you call a group horrible, someone with get butt hurt and respond accordingly. Which in a round about way is exactly what you did. Any further reading into it is on you.

I can’t believe it actually worked lol

Because it was found for the first time. I didn’t even need to read the article to answer your question.

And then you have people on here, which are also idiots but with a superiority complex!

Yeah but it’s the cool kind of racism that’s allowed so it’s okay!

Hey, a civil internet conversation! I’ll take it, cheers!

I agree with you that prohibition isn’t the way to do things. In my opinion the war on drugs is a waste of tax payers money and more importantly human life stuck behind bars. If you are speaking against criminalization of substances I’m with you. I’m however, not against harm reduction and education, including warning labels on products that are harmful.

Sure I’ll establish it with in context. Just because “other things are also dangerous” doesn’t mean warning should not be on the label of a known carcinogen. This is coming from someone who drinks more than he should.

Putting a warning on the label of a product known to cause harm isn’t “controlling others”. You are free to still consume the product. It is allowing you to make an informed choice, even if you are unaware or unable to access that information from other sources.

And here come all the angry tankies

Slippery slope fallacy.

Because lots of other turds clearly agree with the sack of shit.

My assumption is this is just a helping of the larger tray off screen.