Would it be a downside? Slower? Very costly?
Would it be a downside? Slower? Very costly?
Putin, please stop this war without demands.
Ok, but it might be in other areas. Example lets see someone invent very high efficiently on solar panels with no weight at all. Or lets get rid of rubber wheels and do sifi so the car can hover over the road.
It would be wonder if they last forever and easly could be repaired. Making it better to keep the car then buy a new one. It just need to be upgradedable to the latest standards that might be more safe, efficient and agree with current law.
But I am pretty that would never exist - too hard.
Running updates at shutdown/upstart is something I am not a big fan of. It might be safe but I would rather roll back if something goes wrong.
Yes. The question comes down to how many of these you need. And do you have the resources for it?
Sure but I also want that the person to be able to last the whole 4 years period without running into any of those health issues with time. Might be hard to get the health measurements right and get people to accept it. Easier for people to just understand the person did not meet the age criteria.
It depends how out of date you are.
Many have promised that when they die the money should be used for charity. Warren Buffet started this trend.
The bad part here is they can waste all the money however they want and nothing can stop them. Example, they buy cars just to blow them up, not one but 1000. They can afford it. Good for the environment? No, but fun for them as they might have found a new sport.
I would like to see more requirements:
This is the part i dislike like with Fedora compared with Ubuntu. It is so many updates.
But since you can choose the time when to install the updates, there is a less of a problem.
Normally you don’t notice any difference. And updates is much faster to install on Linux in general. Windows eats loads of CPU.
Are they required by law or something to send those out? It is almost like needing to reconfirm your cookie in the webbrowser
I look at this from the developers perspective. Only need to learn one is good.
I don’t really see a problem with a snaps/flatpaks as long as they are not on application I use every day.
But maybe it is easier if we have one standard instead of two.
When Mozilla provide the firefox deb package - Why not give it then? IMO snaps/flatpacks are slower to start, can’t be updated while running, takes more diskspace, and takes longer time to update. With the isolation we also have different kind of problems - have you given it the correct permission?, and how do you get keepassxc browser extension to work with it(they dont support it)?
How many % of these 70% can’t upgrade to windows 11 due to hardware limitation?
I guess even pressing random buttons is fun enough.
These things were made for kids. But I guess there is a kids mode available on smartphone. Never even looked for it.
But yeah, games and movies I guess they are looking for.
Just stop supporting the biggest actor in the market.