• 4 Posts
  • 93 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 25th, 2024

help-circle



  • yes, let’s show democrats that we disapprove of the president’s actions in how a foreign state is handling a war that is just barely on the other side of genocide but definitely on the other side of war crimes by withholding our votes from him, ensuring that someone who absolutely hates us and will do nothing to stop that war, and will not make sure humanitarian aid gets to the civilians unlike the current democratic president. and also by the way the other guy will blanket ban anyone of my religion from entering the country and will try to deport anyone who is my religion from this country even if they are citizens, naturalized or native born. that will teach those democrats who probably will never hold power again unless there is another violent domestic conflict.

    do these people ever consider the consequences of their (in)actions outside of their bubble?


  • normally debating draws clearer distinctions between the candidates and helps the low information voter in making their decision.

    this isn’t a normal election.

    you have one candidate who is a normal politician willing and able to make his case for what he feels is best in moving the other forward. the other is a raving ranting tax cheat and sexual predator who has absolutely no clue about foreign policy, domestic policy, financial policy and is transparently going after one type of person. that other person is also easily swayed to do everything that a minority of a minority population wants because that demographic cheers him and praises him as a god king.

    there is absolutely nothing to be gained from a debate between the two major party candidates other than the disgust of a nation when one of them spews his vitriol about the non whites and the stochastic terrorism he inspires from his unchecked hate speech. it is in the best interests of that candidate to not debate, since the political media does every fucking thing in it’s power to not accurately or report in a timely fashion the utterly bizzare and undemocratic statements he makes on a regular basis. letting him fly free to direct questioning will only drive away the middle of the voting population, the ones who actually vote people into office.


  • not to me.

    I stayed in a college town for a summer in a state college prep type program, so I would have been at the perfect age to really enjoy the “college town” experience. it’s not really for me. and it doesn’t really have much of anything to do with the town itself. I liked the place that I stayed in. however driving over 30 minutes to go to a place as middling as a japanese restaurant was not so appealing. having services around is important to me, so unless it’s a giant college town like lexington, ky I’m not going to be interested.

    ps. I’m not going to live in lexington because lexington sucks.



  • I didn’t say people who agree with me are afraid jews will call them antisemitic. if anything I said. people, people close to and or in power are not being as explicit as I am. and by the way, jews aren’t calling people antisemitic. people who support a pro israel only agenda are calling people antisemitic. that includes jewish people who are vocal about what israel is doing. that’s why that word has no power. and in no way did I suggest people do not have a reason to disagree with me, other than intentionally misreading my comment to try to draw out an argument.

    if all of that is beyond you and it clearly is, having a discussion with you would be similar to wrestling with a pig in mud: you end up angry and muddy and. the pig just enjoys it. I choose to not engage.