“Only at least 15%”
As in one could expect the study to yield a higher low bound.
“Only at least 15%”
As in one could expect the study to yield a higher low bound.
If she didn’t bring a rotisserie chicken, that hat is definitely too big. But if she thought of bringing one, her brain is so large that it wouldn’t leave any room for the chicken.
That hat is a real Catch 22.
Don’t worry, it’s not like I’m yielding. The point is that I find them to be detractors rather than attractors to join our common goal of not eliminating ourselves.
I still subscribe to the theory that these people are hired actors from Big Oil. They are experts at being unlikable and naturally pushes me towards the opposing side. It sucks.
ISO 3103. RTFM!
But the post says “horse” not “house”. You know, like the neigh-type of thing.
A steadily increasing curve would always be above its average, no?
Look at something written 500 years ago. 100 years ago. 50 years ago. Language changes all the time, and there is no stopping that. Yep, language is an endless cycle of switching out common words and adapting to social rules. I’d highly reccommend to follow that flow instead of trying to bring back the “good old days” when n-words and r-words were common and accepted.
I don’t get the obsession with reintroducing negatively charged words into the common language. Isn’t english a rich enough language that there’s an abundance of substitutes for words?
Awful taste but great execution.
When I’m uncertain about something, I’ll often go with “I’m 76.5% sure that…” (Or some other number which reflects my confidence).
Those numbers are worringly low. I have been assuming that the vocal group, the ones taking to the streets with their little hats and grumpy faces, were a very verbal minority. I’d expect way more than 1/3 to prefer some other candidate. Not great.
I love how they are displaying their parking skills
Right. Well, I have a question:
Why?
A spherical tray should work. Make sure it has enough mass to make its gravitational field hold on to the batter and suspend it in the oven using magnets.
The real answer would be “don’t”. Have a decent whitelist dor training data with reliable data. Don’t just add every orifice of the internet (like reddit) to the training data. Limitations would be good in this case.
How can you mention all those weird variations of bikes without mentioning a normal bike?
Dang, the pronoun discussion has lead me to forget that pronouns include I, we and they. I’ll make use of this.
“What are your pronouns?”
“I / me”
This is how flat earth society was formed.
Just to make sure to not take sides, I pronounce the ‘g’ as in ‘design’