po-lina-ergi

Assuming the wording of a law exists to protect you was your first mistake

Apparently not, given the content of this article

You can’t get GI through spicy autocorrect ? 😱

He criticized him what more do you people want

Hindenburg appointed Hitler as chancellor

No pigs were harmed in the making of these scams

This is a hostage video

The conversation goes

• Taxation is theft because it’s involuntary
• Having to have a job is also involuntary
• No you can choose not to have a job you’ll just be homeless
• You can choose not to pay taxes you’ll just go to prison, because “just don’t have income or property” is as impractical as “just live your life from prison”

I merely disagreed with your proposal in detail and asked you to defend it if you were so convinced of it.

So you’re just strawmanning me? Because at no point have I made a “proposal”.

What position do you want me to defend? So far my position has been that the US should be doing more to apply pressure to Israel.

How do you disagree with that WITHOUT taking the stance that any other action would lead to a worse outcome?

Pointing out that cutting our nose to spite our face is a bad policy

Again, what is this hypothetical cutting of the nose?

If you say that doing anything more than what the US is currently doing will “do worse than fuck all”, how is that not an endorsement of that policy? You’re saying it’s the best option.

My guy you’re literally saying there’s no solution that isn’t worse than doing what the current administration is doing, which is more or less nothing.

That’s not a straw man. That’s just restating your argument at you.

You’re right there’s absolutely no solution remotely possible, and that justifies the complete lack of even trying anything spicier than “Bibi pls”

I don’t care about the weapons. Israel obviously doesn’t need more weapons to finish their genocide.

It’s just pretty obvious that you don’t make a real effort to prevent a state completing it’s genocide before you stop supplying them with arms.

You think they’ve actually tried? Given that they’re still supplying weapons to them?

The last new functionality that Reddit added that was actually good was subreddits.

It does if you’re not being willfully obtuse

“why does a decline in freshwater supply matter when it all ends up in the sea anyway?”

Importing events FROM the movies is a very different thing to exporting events TO the movies.

For anybody who doesn’t understand the argument, it’s specifically a rebuttal to the idea that “The second amendment only applies to muzzle loaded muskets because nothing more advanced existed at the time”

“Free speech only applies to newspapers and soapboxes because nothing more advanced existed at the time”

That’s not an answer to the question and your reading comprehension is bad if you think it is.

“oh no, don’t”, whispers biden from the sidelines