• cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    8 months ago

    I expect Jimmy will be right behind her, he probably only stuck around this long so she wouldn’t have to be alone

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember reading a paper about how the death of your spouse raises the probability of death by 30%, but it goes back to normal after 6 months.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        8 months ago

        I knew a girl whose father died a week after her mother’s body was found (they don’t know how long her mother had been dead, but at least a week) and they were divorced. But he never gave up hope until she died. And this was in high school. Imagine losing both of your parents within a week and you’re still a teenager.

        Thankfully, she turned out okay.

      • mayonaise_met@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        On one side my grandfather died roughly 6 months after my grandmother died. On the other side my grandmother outlived my grandfather by 33 years and counting.

      • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Any potential link to that article? I don’t disbelieve you, I just want to be able to discuss the information in the future with confidence.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          I learned it in Hassan Zadeh A. and Amirhashchi S., “Modelling Joint Lifetimes of Couples by Using Bivariate Phase-type Distributions”, that paper should be easily to find in Arvix. The referenced paper, “Young, the mortality of widowers 1963, Lancet”, it’s pretty hard to find but I got my university to pay for a copy for me, if you DM me your email I can send you a copy.

          • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s a very kind offer, but based off the title alone, I don’t think I’d be able to understand anything beyond the abstract.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        What’s the causal factor for the increased mortality rate? I hear it’s “a broken heart” but that isn’t really a medical diagnosis.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They’re statistics and actuarial sciences papers, not medical ones. They are not bussy looking for the underlining reasons of why that happens, bit how can be measured to make better models.

        • ganove@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It is called “broken heart syndrome”.

          "Broken heart syndrome is a condition that can cause rapid and reversive heart muscle weakness, also known as stress cardiomyopathy.

          What causes broken heart syndrome? Two kinds of stress — emotional or physical — often cause broken heart syndrome. But while most people with this condition experience a stressful event, up to 30% of patients have no identifiable trigger at the time of their initial symptoms.

          Emotional Stressors Emotional stressors include:

          -Grief

          -Fear

          -Extreme anger

          -Surprise

          source

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not long after Ronald Reagan, with enormous help from the Christian Right, won the election against Jimmy Carter, Barbara Walters asked Rosalynn Carter what it would do to the country.

    “I think the President makes us comfortable with our prejudices,” she said. How prescient.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      Man what a solid gold reply from her.

      It’s both self acknowledging (as her husband had been a president)

      And it’s cutting (suggesting Reagan surfaced new prejudices)

      All without being obviously rude

      • pinkdrunkenelephants
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I argue that kind of timidity only enabled the right wing to get worse and only continues to make our problems worse.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          There’s a big difference between being polite but clever, and being timid

          • pinkdrunkenelephants
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Statements like that in a modern context clearly are extremely timid. We don’t need people giving subtle insults to make themselves sound smart. We need people openly, honestly and directly calling out the fascism and possible genocide and treating it for what it is.

            This is not about her or looking better. This is about the future of the country and in a very real way, humanity. It’s bigger than a battle of egos.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Lost in the sauce.

              This was from a different era by someone with different goals.

              You are missing the point of the interaction this occurred in.

              • pinkdrunkenelephants
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m looking at it from a modern, or rather post modern, context where it’s really fucking obvious that this was the beginning of the rise of the fascist right in the U.S.

                We’re a year, two years at most, away from a civil war. This is not the time to circlejerk over petty thinly disguised insults. Her doing that in no way benefitted anyone back then or anyone now.

                In fact, it’s makes the problem worse by letting the Democrats feel like they’ve won something while the right entrenches more political power and preps to commit mass murder on a scale that will leave a dark mark on human history.

                You’d take the situation more seriously if you gave a shit, but you clearly don’t.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I “give a shit” just fine but this isn’t a modern comment, and to speak as you wish she would have would be completely inappropriate for her in that moment. She was sufficiently cutting, for those with the intelligence to recognize it.

                  I’m done here cya.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am not a US citizen, nor do I know about how Carter’s poltical carreer is seen in the US, but both Jimmy and his wife both seem like decent humans.

    I am sure that this comment will open the floodgates and tell me I’m wrong, but for the moment, that is my oppinion.

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh no. I suspect Jimmy won’t be long then, since such close couples frequently die close to each other, as they are each other’s support.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    She was widely regarded for her political shrewdness, drawing particular praise for her keen electoral instincts, down-to-earth appeal, and work on behalf of the White House, including serving as an envoy to Latin America.

    Their four children were each born in different states: John William in Virginia, James Earl III in Hawaii, Donnel Jeffrey in Connecticut, and Amy Lynn — their only daughter — in Georgia.

    “Rosalynn Carter will not be simply an East Wing ornament, a First Lady content to redecorate the White House or preside over soirees,” Newsweek’s Jane Whitmore wrote in January 1977.

    She joined Cabinet meetings, attended key briefings, spoke on behalf of the White House at ceremonial gatherings, served as an honorary member on a mental health commission, and traveled to Latin American nations as the president’s personal envoy.

    Jimmy Carter’s presidency itself was judged to be a mixed bag, and many Americans — including some Democrats — believed that he was an ineffective commander in chief, particularly as the Iranian hostage crisis dominated headlines in late 1979.

    Rosalynn worked tirelessly in the bid to re-elect her husband to a second term in 1980 — a campaign Jimmy lost to Ronald Reagan, a former Hollywood star and governor of California who represented the ascendant conservative movement.


    The original article contains 1,403 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!