Iran said it launched dozens of drones and ballistic missiles towards Israel on Saturday in a major attack following days of acute tension building up in the region and warnings from the US and elsewhere about a wider conflict erupting.

Air attack warning sirens began wailing over Jerusalem just before 2am local time on Sunday after the weapons were fired a few hours earlier from Iran with US and Jordanian military assisting Israel’s air defenses in intercepting the first incoming barrage.

With weapons believed to be still in the air en route to Israel, Iran’s mission to the United Nations posted on X: “Iran’s military action was in response to the Zionist regime’s aggression against our diplomatic premises in Damascus. The matter can be deemed concluded.”

However, it threatened more severe action in the face of further Israeli aggression and warned the US and Jordan specifically not to assist Israel.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: here are links to the NYT and BBC live feeds.

Edit 2: updated summary and archive to reflect article changes.

  • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    iran is funding and arming hamas, hizballah and the houthis, all of which were attacking israel.
    in addition to their attacks on usa bases.

    • avater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      iran is funding and arming hamas, hizballah and the houthis, all of which were attacking israel. in addition to their attacks on usa bases.

      don’t forget that those fucks also support Russia with their drones…

    • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Wasn’t Hamas created in response to Israeli aggression?

      Not defending Hamas, but they don’t exist in a vacuum.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Israeli far-right gained power in part due to Hamas, PLO and Hezbollah attacks.

        It’s an endless spiral of violence, reprisal and even more violence.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        The goal of Hamas is not “to stop aggression” but to destroy Israel. So it was formed as response to Israel existence, to which many Muslims never agreed.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Meanwhile Israel funds and arms terrorist groups in Iran like the Mojahiden-e-khalq or Al-Nusra in Syria, in addition to their cyber attacks on Iran and assassinations of Iranian scientists.

      • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        al-nusra in syria is funded by qatar, which syrians are suing for that.

        the mek was allegedly supported also by israel, along with the saudis and the usa.
        which had to start after their funding and cooperation with saddam hussein. so after 2003. much after iran’s support for hamas since the 1990’s and the founding of hizballah in the 1980’s.

        and since then they’ve barely done anything other than the 2 assassinations related to iran’s nuclear program. not even close to hamas, houthis’ or hizballah’s actions. and they barely have any weapons or funding compared, let alone thousands of rockets and drones.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Of course Saudi tries to blame their enemy Qatar. That was more of an accusation than any solid proof, at which point the CIA likely helped them to since they were toppling Assad.

          Meanwhile according to Wikipedia:

          There were cases of al-Nusra combatants receiving medical aid in Israel and returning to fight. Former head of Mossad, Efraim Halevy, in an interview for al-Jazeera implicitly confirmed that such practices had taken place

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, it does, and it sucks. It’s basically war over there. That said, attacking an embassy is a line where Israel’s actions should have been condemned. The point is not that Iran is in the right in any way, the point is Israel is just as wrong here.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        Iran’s response isn’t proportional though. Israel made a single strike on military leaders using a nearby embassy. Launching dozens of drones is an escalation.

        It’s not even a smart escalation. It allows Israel to claim they were attacked disproportionately and launch strikes on Iran’s actual military in country. Iran has much worse defenses against cruise missiles and drones. Now they may lose what sympathy they had from other countries.

        I predict the US will free the ship Iran took today within a few weeks. Maybe the Navy will knock out all Iran’s anti-air radar in the south, just as a show of force, and then not attack anything. That would be a good way to tell them to stop without killing.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Israel escalated by striking an embassy, breaking the Vienna convention, to Iran arming insurgents. That was Israel launching four missiles at Iranian sovereign territory, targeting high-ranking Iranian military officials, on ground that is considered to be sacrosanct internationally to preserve diplomacy in times of war.

          The thing is, the drones are proportional retaliation, but still, it should be on both sides to try to de-escalate.

          What I see though is that Israel wasn’t even condemned for the attack, in fact they tried to claim it wasn’t even an embassy they hit. Now the problem is that Iran, with its leadership and government being how it is, can’t let this go as they are humiliated. When Trump killed Soleimani, which was a similar strike (but not at an embassy!), Iran launched attacks at US bases, wounding US troops which the US let go without retaliation. That’s how it got de-escalated.

          Your point with “let’s humiliate Iran by performing a show of force” is that they won’t take it and de-escalate. It will make it worse. I’m not saying we should let Iran walk all over us, but stepping in to cover one shitty side against another will just lead to either war or another 9/11.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            You didn’t mention the ship they took. If you think the missiles and drones (dozens) are proportional, then the ship makes no sense. Commandeering a civilian ship is clearly extra and disproportionate. They’re probably not going to give that up without getting something in return.

            The leaders of Iran are desperate to seem tough to their domestic audience, like Putin. That’s why they did this. Unfortunately for the people of Iran, this is going to hurt them further with sanctions.

        • FJW@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Iran attacked the specific military installations that Israel used to perform their highly illegal attack on the Iranian embassy. This is the most textbook example of textbook examples of appropriate, proportional and measured self-defense we have seen in a very long time in the entire region. The relevant thing to count is not the number of missiles or drones, but the number of targets and their relevance to the case.