• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You said:

      I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

      Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?

      • figaro@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent.

        Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.

        I’m saying it was near 0%.

        Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?