• cmeu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because everything costs so fucking much that the “economy” doesn’t represent their daily experience

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article states that most people surveyed said their personal financial situation improved but they still think the economy is bad.

      Let that sink in. Most people say they are better off, but most of them still think the economy is bad. They know that they themselves are doing good but think it sucks for everyone else.

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        In the telephone survey of 1,818 adults Aug. 10-14, 71% of Americans described the economy as either not so good or poor. And 51% said it’s getting worse.

        But 60% said their financial situation is good or excellent.

        Come the fuck on dude. How can you possibly believe that? And who’s upvoting all your comments?

        Everything you say now is suspect if you can believe that data is representative of most Americans. Not only that, you’re parroting the info everywhere like you’re confident in the data and knowledgeable on the subject, and yet it’s based on fucking phone interviews. What single, working mom do you think answers a random phone number and then is also willing to take an interview about the economy?

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Statistically, some working mothers will answer the phone and finish the survey. If the survey was done correctly, and sampling bias and all that is accounted for, 1800 respondents is plenty to get a good representative picture of Americans. Surveys can work very well; even when using non-ideal survey methods.

          Anecdotally, this survey seems to align pretty well with the people I know. E.g. people complaining about a pie costing something like 30% more than 5 years ago, while their income doubled or tripled in that same timeframe. Help-wanted signs in my area seem to be advertising wages around 50% more than 2019 as well.

          • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I won’t debate your take on phone interviews being representative of any American under 80; I think it’s ridiculous

            About your anecdote, you’re saying you think some people earn double or triple at the same job? Surely not, right? So what about the people that still work at those jobs? How do you think life is going for them?

            • 31337@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t think anyone I worked with in 2019 has the same job (they were either promoted or switched jobs). For the people working those jobs now, I’m guessing the businesses needed to raise wages to attract new talent, probably more than the ~30% inflation. In regards to family I know that work service or manufacturing jobs, they either switched jobs for higher pay, got promoted, or their union negotiated decent pay increases. Again, I’m guessing most businesses needed to raise their wages to attract workers to replace those that switched jobs; and from the “help wanted” signs I see, it looks like they raised wages more than inflation.

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Please, I can’t afford food or housing”

    Media outlets:

    Economy doing great!!! Inflation down and stocks up!!!

    “Okay, I guess I’ll just fucking die then”

  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Depends on what you mean by “the economy”.
    Wall Street is striving, GDP is striving, but average people struggle to make rent.

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Rich people’s money is thriving under Biden. So why don’t Americans believe it?

    Oh, we do, we just don’t like what’s happening for the rest of us.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I looked over the metrics in the article and none of them approximate what percentage of Americans are struggling to pay their bills. That number probably closely approximates the percentage who think the economy isn’t doing well. This is a different situation from people wrongly believing crime rates are high.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As long as private shareholders are having record quarterly earnings, almost all economists, hired by wealthy organizations largely to push the narrative that benefits those organizations, will of course declare victory.

    Economists also generally defend our “free market” rigged crony capitalism as the only way too. They’re literally the priesthood of this grift.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rent-homelessness-harvard-report-center-for-housing-studies/

    The homelessness epidemic is getting worse. Our people are dying in the streets in record numbers, please, go down to your nearest homeless tent city in every major population center in the US and tell them they’re being dramatic.

    This economy no longer cares about customers or employees. The Reagan/Kemp grift eviscerated the customers first, employees second, investors last model. Now it’s private shareholders first and only demanding companies sabotage their long term future to goose their next quarter with layoffs, anticompetitive behaviors, and tax cheats. Why care about the products/services you literally exist to provide when you’re part of an oligopoly, buying and killing any potential competitors trying to improve your economic sector’s product/service? At that point, you can make shadows of what you used to make and your captive consumer base has nowhere else to go. Despite its primary selling point, market capitalism’s end goal has been thoroughly proven: to END competition.

    Capitalism is eating its own tail having conquered the monopoly board and having no more meaningful new markets left to metastasize in and exploit.

    • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There needs to be laws passed that change the structure of “fiduciaries”

      Companies should exist for their employees first, customers second, and then shareholders, in that order. Pay the people creating the product/service as much as possible, put out the best possible product/service at the most competitive rate possible, and if there’s anything left over the shareholders get their cut.

      Ironically, if corporations actually did this, they’d likely have plenty of success. It’s just mind boggling that the lazy fuckers pushing numbers around on a computer screen are the ones considered fiduciaries

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There is such a business structure. It’s called a worker co-operative. They’re pretty common in some areas (e.g. grocery) where they are able to compete with and even win against traditionally-owned grocery store chains. For example, one of the largest grocery co-operatives in the US, WinCo foods, competes with and actually beats the likes of Walmart and Kroger (called Fred Meyer here) in the price department. They do have some outside investment (IIRC), but the stores are mostly owned by the employees that work there.

        I think we ought to encourage these types of businesses through extremely favourable tax treatment. I’m talking a 0% tax rate on dividends paid by co-operatives to workers. At the same time, it’s understandable that most people start businesses for personal profit, which drives the creation of most businesses, so I think a hybrid system wherein the owner starts with a maximum of 50% equity in the company is fair, and the rest is owned by the workers. Imposing an expiration on the owner’s shares (say, 50 years?) would mean that after the founders die, the entire company will be owned by the workers, while not extinguishing the motivation for people to establish businesses in the first place.

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Only rich people and corporations are doing well.

    EVERYONE ELSE is in a fucking recession…

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      And however you DO measure it, it’s better now than last term.

      NOT BEST. Better. That’s a reasonable measuring stick.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I really don’t like that the sources on this article are missing.

    Sure, that’s a lot of money for the wealthy who control 93% of stock, but it’s also tens of millions of Americans who will have a more comfortable and secure retirement. In fact, the number of Americans who have over $1 million in their retirement accounts grew by 20% in the last quarter of 2023.

    Fine and dandy, except that half of Americans don’t have a retirement account. Or 47% of Americans.

    So while retirement indexes are up, 1:2 people are not going to see that.

    Inflation eased slightly in April — the first time this year that has happened. Overall inflation edged down to 3.4% and slipped to 3.6% when you exclude food and energy costs. (food expected to rise by an additional 2.2%)

    Good to see the brakes are working. But just remember that not everyone goes out to by a car or house on a twice-a-week basis. But everyone does with the grocery store. Which in Biden’s defense, he has started trying to pull back.

    Though effort =/= job done.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Surely there are some numbers we could look at every day besides the stock market numbers. Like couldn’t we have Real Income and/or Purchasing Power right next to the DOW and the S&P? Or how about instead of the Dow and S&P since, like you said - most Americans lives don’t change by the changes in the stock market.

  • bbuez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Instead of complaining about the obvious disconnect between metrics and real world, often regional CoL, etc etc (oh and cost of medical care). Here’s a simple solution:

    Raise federal minimum wage, it’s been a good decade and a bit since it went up from $5/h, the dollar has only inflated oh about 45% since 2009

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And obviously trump is the better solution, crayon eater? Two things can be true at the same time: it sucks for regular people but it sucks less now than in 2019.

      • AshMan85@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        your logic is flawed. of course both can be true, they serve the same master of corporations. l am still voting for the lesser of two evils, hillary 2.0, i mean biden.