I feel like there is no web browser with a sane default configuration that I can recommend to other people. All browsers are preconfigured in a way that harms the privacy of their users or include services that no one wants such as Pocket and BAT.

Here are my problems with some popular browsers.

  • Mozilla Firefox: Pocket integration, no ad-blocking without extensions.

  • Brave: Everything related to crypto. Also its start page is horrible.

  • Chromium: No ad-blocking without extensions and soon Manifest v3 will cripple all content blockers.

Now, these suboptimal defaults wouldn’t be such a big problem if the configuration files were easy to backup and restore and respected the XDG base directory specification.

  • marlowe221@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s kinda the same with Brave. Just take 2 seconds to turn off the crypto thing and forget it was ever there.

    I’m primarily a Firefox user but keep Brave around for Chromium-based browser testing.

    Just turn it off, folks!

      • vector_zero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is it not open source? You can literally audit the code and point out any shadiness yourself.

      • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, and there’s definitely some pay-offs going on with their reviews. Almost every one of them says something close to “This browser pays you just for browsing the internet!,” most of them don’t mention that it’s crypto, and none of them mention that it has nothing to do with browsing, but is instead for clicking integrated ads.

    • yukijoou@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      though brave has 2 issues you can’t turn off:

      • it’s chromium-based, and strenghtens the browser engine monopoly
      • the company behind it seems quite shady, and afaik the ceo/leader/founder/… is homophobic
      • marlowe221@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, obviously not great. Hence why I only use it for testing.

        I would love to ignore Chromium based browsers completely I’m a web developer, so I can’t.

        I wish there were a Chromium browser I could have the warm fuzzies about, but I’m not aware of one.

      • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        the browser engine monopoly

        I don’t think you understand what a monopoly is. Chromium was developed specifically to avoid a monopoly…

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Chromium was developed specifically to avoid a monopoly…

          [Citation needed]

          • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No one at Google is going to say that out loud. But it’s a fairly obvious assumption.

            Same reason that Firefox is almost entirely funded by Google