• CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve actually heard it the other way: if your employer knows you have cancer or other disability, they have to try even harder to fire you to ensure that they could survive a lawsuit.

    • Lommy241@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t know about that. He took like four months off for cancer treatment. And he’s going to need to take more off for more treatment. Not sure how you can hide that from your employer.

      • bean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        3 months. End of October to start of February. It shouldn’t matter though. How long should he have worked there before he’s allowed to? Like if he was CPO for five years and then got cancer, would that have been OK? At what point does it become not ok?

        Also he’s got history there and this promotion was due to that. I think they just expected from him to take the reigns on some stuff and then wasn’t there because of the cancer treatment which is 100% understandable. Mozilla isn’t going to collapse in 3 months.

        On the day Teixeira returned to his job, it’s claimed, he was instructed to lead a company-wide layoff of 50 people, 40 of whom were in his MozProd organization.

        That’s just shit management from above. That is pure retaliation.

          • ___@l.djw.li
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            After you spend down your allotted PTO, yes.

            Mildly surprised that someone in a position at that level wouldn’t have at minimum short term disability coverage, at least as an option. It’s hardly expensive.

    • Engywuck@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      3 days ago

      Independently on US laws, It’s funny how people in the technosphere still believe that Mozilla are the good guys.

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        We’re purity testing Mozilla now? What’s up with that…There are no “good” or “bad” guys, this isn’t a morality play. It’s fucking browsers, bro, and to equate Mozilla to Microsoft or Google is insane.

      • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        93
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        We need to, because they are the only ones fighting against Chrome monopoly. It’s so sad to read news like this

      • idefix@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t understand your comment. They are the good guys browser-wise but that doesn’t mean they are good guys everywhere.