![](https://kolektiva.social/system/accounts/avatars/000/019/158/original/fd43841fa9a5858f.jpg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
there are web clients for mumble
you should know i am earnest. i’m learning how to snark. i try to say what i mean and mean what i say.
sometimes i do try to make jokes, but I am not sarcastic.
there are web clients for mumble
sounds like it’s time to allow third-party clients distribute the server software, shut down free “servers” and offer paid hosting and support. that would cut costs a great deal.
i’m not wishing. i’m organizing.
use the service, and tell them to use it. just like how they made you use discord. and you can whine every time they refuse.
no one said they are the same
they didn’t say threads is transphobic. tehy said threads allows transphobic content
>The Japanese still exist due to the bomb and the Emperor.
nuking two cities is genocide, and it isn’t a favor to the survivors.
>The US would not have stopped without total surrender. That would not have come without massive loss of life.
neither of these statements can be proven.
>Japan surrendered due to the Bomb drops.
we will never know whether they would have surrendered without them on the same time table.
it wasn’t a trolley though, was it? it was individuals making decisions.
>they stopped more from occuring
this can’t be proven
let’s not say nukes are good. did the nukes undo those atrocities?
The morality of an action doesn’t change because of the number of people that agree with you. doing bad things is bad. people who do bad things and continue to do bad things and plan to do bad things are bad people. I don’t vote for bad people.
they made a good point, you just don’t like it
it seems like your going to vote for someone. I say vote for who you think you should.
so I will make you a deal: I’ll vote my conscience, and you vote yours.
and in the meantime we organize, and after, we organize
>think asking what you personally risk from a Trump vs Biden presidency speaks to whether your insufferable self-righteousness is gambling with other people’s lives at no cost to you.
appealing to emotion doesn’t change the truth values of any of your claims, either.
my identity doesn’t change the truth of anything i’ve said. it has no bearing on this conversation, but your attempt to raise it implies you are going to be attempting to use my identity rhetorically. that’s called “ad hominem”, when you attack the speaker instead of what they have said.
I’m organizing locally to build power outside of the state.