• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m coming at you for acting like you’re making a valid point, and lying when people confront you about it. Now, could you please explain?

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You said:

        I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

        Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent.

          Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.

          I’m saying it was near 0%.

          Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?