• SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    We’ll eventually see this period of history as being as extreme with sex crimes as the 80s were with seeing satanic cults everywhere.

    • Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some day we’ll look at all this and laugh just as we do with that “Satanic Panic”

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      With the difference that the huge number of satanic cults people assumed and talked about did not exist.

      While the huge number of sexual assaults, rapes and sexual harassment sadly does exist.

      I feel people are now starting to care more about putting the lid on it, by various degrees, without there being any real progress in the number of cases. People are “more aware” didn’t really lead to more empathy or more help for sexual abuse survivors. There seems to be a bigger push into the direction “well it’s just a part of life, stop talking about it already”.

      • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think so, especially considering that we have 8 year olds on sex offender registries which is just retarded.

        The problem with rape is that many times its very hard to impossible to prove, especially when time has passed. Sometimes it’s possible with messages sent to and from, sometimes with a rape kit.

        But what if there was a rape without witnesses where she was so afraid that she didn’t move, and later je “simply” claims she was a consenting partner?

        What if she actually was a consenting partner and then retroactively claimed it was rape?

        Things get very muddy and dicey very quickly and we’re still living in a “innocent until proven guilty” society, thankfully, but it does make rape a very complicated subject

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I don’t live in a country where something like that is a thing. We don’t have a register for any type of offense.

              But the person I asked wrote about rape in general. That’s why I asked. It wasn’t about a register for juvenile offenders.

              • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                The registry and minors being added to it is the topic of the OP and every comment that follows. Your supposed ignorance of the concept was exhausted as an excuse already.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      We can add the anti-vaping nutjobs to that list too.

      Anyone screaming “think of the children!” should always be viewed with suspicion.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          9 months ago

          All research shows vaping to be essentially harmless, especially compared with cigarettes. But governments and private interests are pushing to get it banned, taxed, and are otherwise attacking it. All because it “harms children”.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            At its most basic it’s water vapour. You know the one thing you’re not supposed to get in your lungs… water. And you can’t exactly trust what certain research shows, it’s too early in the lifespan of vaping to truly know it’s ramifications. Cigarettes used to have research having then saying they were good for you.

            At the end of the day though, what’s the fucking point of vaping other than to be another addictive substance for those on the bottom to be beholden to, like an addict tax keeping their take home income as low as possible. It’s just not something the world needs, so why defend it? Have you got the addict equivalent of buyers bias or something?

            Edit: okay I’ll concede on the water vapour thing. Still don’t want chemicals in my lungs past that though.

            Also to say something else on vapes… I’m fine with it being a stepping stone to get people off cigarettes. The only issue with that is that it’s much more accessible to puff on a vape at any point in the day (as long as it has charge) too the point where someone might actually end up using it way more and at a more concentrated level than what they’d do with cigarettes. It’s not great.

            • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              Its not water vapor, nor is it dangerous to inhale water vapor. Vaping is not safe, but you don’t make a very good argument as to why. The person you’re responding too is also partially correct although they are wrong that vaping is completely harmless. People are often led to believe its more harmful that it truly is because health problems relating to black market marijuana cartridges were falsely attributed to normal vapes.

            • loutr@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not water vapor. It’s mainly propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin, plus flavorings and (optionally) nicotine.

              • Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I don’t care if people defend vaping, they’re the ones damaging their bodies, not me.

                I do think it needs to be more regulated, in terms of where you can and can’t vape. Just like I don’t want to breath in second hand smoke, I don’t want to breath in your vape

                • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah waiting in queues and walking behind people that value is fucking awful. Especially when they’re trying to cosplay as Thomas the tank engine.

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Neverminding that it’s not just water vapor, fog and humidity are also water vapor, and yet we breathe them every day. The substance itself isn’t really the issue. Now, it being hot water vapor, at a higher concentration, and carrying more things than just water vapor, you have some points to stand on.

              Harm reduction is also a very real thing. Sure , vaping is another thing for people to be addicted to. People are going to be addicted, almost everyone to something. I’d rather myself or anyone right now be addicted to vapes than cigs, because it’s LESS harmful, at least according to the current consensus. Of COURSE I’d people just not be addicted but that’s a looooong way off. Stepping stones are good things.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              You know the one thing you’re not supposed to get in your lungs… water.

              What the fuck lol that’s not how anything works

              You’ve never breathed humid air before? That’s water vapor

              And you can’t exactly trust what certain research shows

              WAKE UP SHEEPLE

                • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  This is a reasonable take. No one wants to force them on you or anyone else. If someone’s vaping and you’re breathing it in secondhand, sure they’re a problem, and you should probably politely ask them to be respectful, then get reasonably upset when they don’t. But let them have their thing otherwise.

            • Someology@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              They are either working for a vape company or so hopelessly addicted they can’t admit negatives.

            • Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              9 months ago

              Your lungs need water to function and also u don’t vape water vapour the fact you said that shows that u haven’t researched any of this indepthly.

          • Someology@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Nicotine still has negative health effects, even without tar. It is not harmless. We’ve also had multiple waves of badly manufactured carts with lead contamination, chemicals known to cause lung damage, etc. It harms everyone who vapes. And everyone whose face they blow vape into. But, it at least far less obnoxious than actual cigarettes.

            • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              the bathroom at work smells much better after a vaper has used it as opposed to the guy that smokes ciggies. not even good cigs either, they smell old and crusty

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              Nicotine still has negative health effects

              At a similar level to caffeine. Less than Marijuana and much less than alcohol. Essentially harmless.

              We’ve also had multiple waves of badly manufactured carts with lead contamination, chemicals known to cause lung damage, etc.

              Maybe standards regulation is the answer instead of banning? But anyway, it’s a small minority of carts that are poorly made like this.