• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m coming at you for acting like you’re making a valid point, and lying when people confront you about it. Now, could you please explain?

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You said:

          I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

          Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?

          • figaro@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent.

            Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.

            I’m saying it was near 0%.

            Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?