• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        7·
        2 months ago

        I’m coming at you for acting like you’re making a valid point, and lying when people confront you about it. Now, could you please explain?

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            7·
            2 months ago

            You said:

            I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

            Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?

            • figaro@lemdro.idEnglish
              71·
              2 months ago

              Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              15·
              2 months ago

              There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent.

              Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.

              I’m saying it was near 0%.

              Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?

                  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                    2·
                    2 months ago

                    lol

                    One protest of all the violent people and thousands of separate protests of nonviolent individuals

                    This statistically, overwhelmingly lawful and good