• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m coming at you for acting like you’re making a valid point, and lying when people confront you about it. Now, could you please explain?

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              You said:

              I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

              Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?

              • figaro@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent.

                Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.

                I’m saying it was near 0%.

                Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?